The one statement that is stuck in my head, and will probably define capitalism for the next three years is this, “capitalism is actually legalized greed”… Then people start making money again and when everyone’s got enough, we are back to the “Capitalism is a good thing” world again and ignore the rants and raves of people such as Michael Moore. This is because the ones who think capitalism is bad and socialism is good suddenly have an influx of people who feel bad for themselves and think that their neighbor who works less than them and makes a lot more money is probably a greedy capitalist. My professor used to say, “Recession is when your neighbor loses his job, and depression is when you lose yours.” Capitalism is this well oiled lean and mean machine that is bound to rebound again; you’ve just got to hang in there and spend, spend and spend even more and things will be just fine (over simplified but you get the point).
So check this out. Single mothers in rural India (Jharkhand, India) are making a statement by coming to work and that’s not all, they now want to bike to work. Here’s a bit of background on this amazing story. These single mothers were without a job since it is a stigma in rural India to be a single mother and hence no one would hire them. The fact that the husband walked out on the marriage does not reflect poorly on the man, rather it is “understood and accepted” that the woman must have done something wrong for the man to walk out on the marriage. Well, their employment with Rural Handicrafts Company is changing all of that. Now, they come to work every day, work hard, are extremely productive and are making an impact in their society. One day they approached me and wanted to know if they could bike to work and it hit me like a bolt of lightening. This is what I call empowerment. I've given them jobs, but the initiative to stand up for themselves has to come from within and it was both a surprise and extremely refreshing to hear them talk about wanting to push and shove against their man-made boundaries. I offered to help by coming up with the down payments needed to get them all bikes and now we have workers at RHC who bike to work every day. By the way, it is extremely uncommon to see women on bikes in rural India (another one of those empowerment issues).
So what’s with all the Indian business journals featuring social entrepreneurs on their covers and extensively covering entrepreneurial ventures in India. I guess it’s free publicity for these guys and I am happy for them. The thing about these articles and the coverage in general that irks me is that they have the word social attached to entrepreneurship. Now, there are a few social entrepreneurs in these magazines and I recognize that, but the majority of them are just plain ol’ bread and butter entrepreneurs who are trying to make it big and since 80% of India is made up of villages, their ventures are either located in villages or cater to the villagers. This does not make their ventures a social venture. The argument of the editors is that these ventures help people, well guess what, if a venture does not help people, social, capitalistic, anarchist or otherwise, it is not going to survive. Maybe it is just that India is such a nascent capitalistic country recovering from the hangovers of socialism that it is a bit embarrassing to acknowledge its entrepreneurs as people who are out to make a lot of money and has to use a euphemism and mask them as social entrepreneurs.
Here’s a link to our entrepreneurial venture, Rural Innovations Company.

